Following her success in Elizabeth Cate Blanchett returned to the role in Elizabeth: The Golden Age, which was set at the time of the Spanish Armada. Despite a number of inaccuracies and liberties with history I enjoyed it very much and it went down well when we screened it for our Film Society. On this basis I wonder if there is any mileage in Helen Mirren returning to the role of Elizabeth II in a sequel to The Queen. In the first film Michael Sheen was uncannily brilliant portraying Blair in his early pomp, but I'd be struggling to cast either Cameron or Clegg.
Here are my notes for The Golden Age:
UK, 2007 (114 minutes)
Director: Shekhar Kapur
Starring: Cate Blanchett, Clive Owen and Geoffrey Rush
Awards and Nominations
Oscars
Won Oscar
for Best CostumesNominated Cate Blanchett (Actress in a Leading Role)
BAFTAS Four
nominations, including Cate Blanchett for Best Leading Actress
A further three wins and seven nominations
In 1585 Catholic Spain, the most
powerful country in Europe, is plotting to invade England and overthrow the heretic
Elizabeth (Cate Blanchett). Philip II
has built an Armada and the execution of Mary Queen of Scots gives him the
excuse he needs to launch it. A
combination of the naval skills of Sir Walter Raleigh (Clive Owen), Spanish
miscalculation and the English weather allow a numerically inferior English
fleet to destroy the Armada and save both Queen and country.
Cate Blanchett’s portrayal of Elizabeth
in Elizabeth
(1998) and Elizabeth: The Golden Age
(2007) offers a very different view of the queen, but one which again has similarities
with our own recent history. The first film
shows the real dangers that Elizabeth faces both during the reign of her
half-sister and after gaining the crown herself, when she has to overcome attempts
to dethrone her by disaffected courtiers as well as defeating external
rebellions, eventually realising that in order to consolidate her power and
retain the throne she needs to remain unmarried. In the later film Elizabeth is still receiving
suitors from across Europe, but at the same time Catholic powers in Europe are
plotting to overthrow her: she survives an unsuccessful assassination plot by
religious zealots and then unites her subjects by portraying herself as a
moderate who will defend English Protestants and Catholics against the
fundamentalist practices of the Spanish Inquisition that would follow a
successful invasion by the Spanish Armada.
Shekhar Kapur has rejected claims
that his film is anti-Catholic; he sees it rather as a conflict between Philip
who had no ability to encompass diversity or contradiction and Elizabeth who
had a feminine ability to do precisely that.
This perspective compels him to interpret history with a significant degree
of artistic licence: in 1585 Elizabeth was 52, although the film shows her
still receiving suitors; Fotheringay Castle, where Mary Queen of Scots was
beheaded, is situated on the flat plains of Northamptonshire rather than on the
banks of a picturesque loch; and Sir Walter Raleigh played only a minor in the
defeat of the Spanish Armada. In Alan
Bennett’s memorable phrase this is histrionics rather than history, but it
follows in a glorious tradition that we can trace back to Shakespeare. Did anyone ever expect Richard III to give an accurate picture of pre-Tudor history?
Here's the trailer: