This week we screened the most recent film from the Coen Brothers: Hail Caesar.
early on in our society's existence we screened Fargo (on the basis that it is mandatory for all film societies to show it at some point in their existence), but Hail Caesar was quite different: a screwball comedy set in 19502 Hollywood. It went down well, but some people were a little disappointed by George Clooney's role, as it was quite different from his more box-office friendly work. I enjoyed it very much.
Here are my notes:
“The Coen brothers have done an Eddie Mannix on Eddie Mannix, covering up all the darkest,
dirtiest parts of his story to create a sparkling comedy. Everything you see on
screen is completely historically inaccurate – but that’s the point. Hail, Caesar! can wear its fail grade
with pride."
Here is the trailer:
early on in our society's existence we screened Fargo (on the basis that it is mandatory for all film societies to show it at some point in their existence), but Hail Caesar was quite different: a screwball comedy set in 19502 Hollywood. It went down well, but some people were a little disappointed by George Clooney's role, as it was quite different from his more box-office friendly work. I enjoyed it very much.
Here are my notes:
Hail,
Caesar!
USA 2016 104
minutes
Director: Ethan
and Joel Coen
Starring: Josh Brolin, George
Clooney, Alden Ehrenreich, Ralph Fiennes, Jonah Hill, Scarlett Johansson,
Frances McDormand, Tilda Swinton and Channing Tatum
“The Coen brothers’
lovingly goofy latest comes on like a breezy flipside companion-piece to Barton Fink – a jaunt through the
underbelly of old Hollywood which finds not the fiery hell of the tortured
artist but the upbeat splash of synchronised swimming, On the Town toe-tapping and toga-wearing biblical balderdash. With
a ramshackle plot that appears to have been cooked up after drawing deep on the
Dude’s biggest bong, the film pinballs between awol movie stars, red-scare
nightmares and Bikini Atoll bomb tests, while raising important questions of
whether God is still angry (“what, he got over it?”), how to make a lasso out
of spaghetti, and the secret of balancing a bunch of bananas on your head (it’s
all in the hips, lips, eyes and thighs, apparently).”
Mark
Kermode
In Hollywood in the
1950s Eddie Mannix (Josh Brolin) works for Capitol Pictures as a fixer whose role
is to keep scandals relating to film stars out of the press. His current work
load includes concealing the news that DeeAnna Morgan (Scarlett Johansson) is
pregnant, rescuing alcoholic actor Baird Whitlock (George Clooney) from a group
of kidnappers whose members include Burt Gurney (Channing Tatum), an actor
currently filming a musical comedy about sailors, and arranging for Laurence
Laurentz (Ralph Fiennes) to cast young singing western film star Hobie Doyle
(Alden Ehrenreich) in the period drama he is directing.
In Hollywood the 1950s was
the time of the Cold War and the Red Scare: its response was to create escapist
entertainment: westerns, musicals with extravagant dance sequences, aquatic
spectacles and Roman epics with massive casts. The Coen Brothers saw the films of
this period on TV when they were growing up and commented:
“We
loved that stuff. We just didn’t realise we were watching crap.”
For the purposes of this
film they re-created their own versions of these films and for verisimilitude
shot them on film rather than employing digital cinematography which they have
used for their most recent films.
The Coen Brothers first
created Capital Pictures for Barton Fink
(1991), but Eddie Mannix was a real character, although his real life was far
more sordid than depicted in this film: he used his network of contacts to
cover up, among other things, Judy Garland’s drug use, Great Garbo’s
bi-sexuality, and was even suspected of involvement in the murder of Superman star George Reeves. The Guardian contains a regular feature
called Reel History which a historian
rates films based on real events for both Entertainment and History. For the
former it receives an A- but a fail for the latter. In mitigation the article
contains the following verdict on the
film: